Sumi, MGMathai, ASheela, RRadhakrishnan, NSRadhakrishnan, VVIndhulekshmy, RMundayoor, S2012-12-042012-12-042001CLINICAL NEUROPATHOLOGY. 20; 4; 176-180http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11495007https://dspace.sctimst.ac.in/handle/123456789/362In an attempt to establish a tuberculous etiology, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and immunohistochemical (IHC) methods were undertaken in formalin-fixed paraffin sections of ten surgical specimens of intracranial tuberculoma. The control group included an equal number of intracranial fungal granuloma. Both PCR and IHC methods did not yield false-positive results in fungal granuloma. PCR was found to be less sensitive (60%) than IHC method (80%) in this study. IHC method definitely possesses several operational advantages over PCR and is more suited to laboratories in developing countries for establishing a tuberculous etiology particularly in those patients in whom the conventional bacteriological methods did not confirm the diagnosis of tuberculoma.ImmunologyDiagnostic utility of polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemical techniques for the laboratory diagnosis of intracranial tuberculoma