A hospital-based registry of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: Can neuroimaging serve as a surrogate biomarker?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorDivya, KP
dc.contributor.authorMenon, RN
dc.contributor.authorThomas, B
dc.contributor.authorNair, M
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-10T03:25:09Z
dc.date.available2017-03-10T03:25:09Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractAim: This study addresses the role of neuroimaging in addition to the available clinical criteria for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) and its impact on its diagnosis in the absence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers and tissue-based approaches. Methods: From a tertiary referral center in the city of Trivandrum, Kerala, South India, patients with rapidly progressive dementia (RPD) who fulfilled the World Health Organization (WHO) 1998 diagnostic criteria for CJD were included in this study. Their electrophysiological-clinical-radiological data were retrospectively studied and the results were analyzed. The other biomarkers of CJD were not assessed in the study. Results: Of the 96 patients with RPD, 41 patients were diagnosed as having a 'probable' and 'possible' CJD using the WHO 1998 diagnostic criteria between 2000 and 2013. While 92% patients satisfied the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) 2007 and European magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-CJD consortium criteria (2009), only 73% satisfied the MRI components of these criteria in addition to the more stringent, proposed UCSF MRI criteria (2011). The latter required the presence of diffusion weighted imaging abnormalities more than fluid attenuation inversion recovery abnormalities in the cortical and subcortical regions for the establishment of diagnosis on MRI of 'definite' (53.7%) and 'probable' CJD (19.5%). Conclusions: Significant heterogeneity exists in the presentation of CJD with only 48.8% patients simultaneously satisfying the MRI and electrophysiological criteria, suggesting that the diagnosis is impacted by these components in any of the currently prevalent criteria. With 27% of the cohort not meeting the radiological criteria, CSF and molecular biomarker assays may be reserved for MRI negative patients with suspected CJD and in atypical presentations.
dc.identifier.citation64 ,3;411-418en_US
dc.identifier.uri10.4103/0028-3886.181538
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.sctimst.ac.in/handle/123456789/9172
dc.publisherNEUROLOGY INDIA
dc.subjectNeurosciences & Neurology
dc.titleA hospital-based registry of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: Can neuroimaging serve as a surrogate biomarker?
Files
Collections
Journal Articles