Microsphere-based gradient implants for osteochondral regeneration: a long-term study in sheep
dc.contributor.author | Mohan, N | |
dc.contributor.author | Gupta, V | |
dc.contributor.author | Sridharan, BP | |
dc.contributor.author | Mellott, AJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Easley, JT | |
dc.contributor.author | Palmer, RH | |
dc.contributor.author | Galbraith, RA | |
dc.contributor.author | Key, VH | |
dc.contributor.author | Berkland, CJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Detamore, MS | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-03-10T03:27:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-03-10T03:27:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The microfracture technique for cartilage repair has limited ability to regenerate hyaline cartilage. Aim: The current study made a direct comparison between microfracture and an osteochondral approach with microsphere-based gradient plugs. Materials & methods: The PLGA-based scaffolds had opposing gradients of chondroitin sulfate and beta-tricalcium phosphate. A 1-year repair study in sheep was conducted. Results: The repair tissues in the microfracture were mostly fibrous and had scattered fissures with degenerative changes. Cartilage regenerated with the gradient plugs had equal or superior mechanical properties; had lacunated cells and stable matrix as in hyaline cartilage. Conclusion: This first report of gradient scaffolds in a long-term, large animal, osteochondral defect demonstrated potential for equal or better cartilage repair than microfracture. | |
dc.identifier.citation | 10 ,6;709-728 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | 10.2217/rme.15.38 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.sctimst.ac.in/handle/123456789/10062 | |
dc.publisher | REGENERATIVE MEDICINE | |
dc.subject | Cell Biology; Engineering | |
dc.title | Microsphere-based gradient implants for osteochondral regeneration: a long-term study in sheep |